Artdeco Glam Vintage Highlighter No. 5 glamorous starlite - non-canonical highlighter or Be careful before you buy - review

Being a fan of all sorts of shimmers / highlighters and Satarov, in the spring, his eyes wandering to one of the Hamburg shopping malls, seduced by the new shiny thing (and no matter what I have 100,500). It is a highlighter, and besides limitka — why not try it, especially as experience with the brand I have is generally good, and I'd love to wear artdecade shadows in one makeup favorite Guerlain.
Artdeco Glam Vintage Highlighter №5 glamorous starlite - неканонический хайлайтер, или Будьте внимательны перед покупкой What came out of our acquaintance under the cut.

To be honest, was another reason I was tempted I this product: fluently (and attentively, but in vain!) viewed the announcement of the collection, inspired by the twentieth years of the last century. And although the photo in the announcement alarmed me somewhat whence the undertaken in the highlighter shade dark (why is it in the highlighter, then?), blurred cosmetic Shopaholic brain operated independently, and gave the hand signal: "Take it." It was only later I have realized that despite its name, is not a highlighter for the face, and apply a highlighting eyeshadow (lesson for future: don't be chicken, read detailed descriptions: name — not all )
Photo:
What lies under the hood:
The colors in the photo match really Well, who can pass?.. The more that happiness inside quite a lot — the caliber compact powder.
Detailed view:
The manufacturer promises no more, no less, as "immerse your eyes in a sea of sparkling lights, illuminating them as if priputnev shining diamonds" (my free translation), arguing that the tool has a soft texture and is easily applied by brush or applicator. Neither one nor the other in the set, as you can see, no, but there is a quite big mirror swings open degrees that way for 150. The package is quite solid: a handy hard case "silver" with an elegant black pattern and a ribbed surface downright declares that inside something really vintage, star-studded and glamorous . GM. I don't know, maybe the starry and glamorous so it should be, but...
First, it is dusty when set on the applicator on the brush. Dusty as real star dust, wildly and mercilessly.
Second, it behaves exactly the same, and your eyes, not wanting to stay in the same place where you applied it diligently and generously showering almost all face the same "diamond dust". That's a lot of it, there are promises made of a hundred percent.
Third: despite the beautiful colors and equally beautiful promises, is applied to the product frankly bad, Blendable bad — probably because of the tendency to dusting rather than lying in the place where you put it (star wanderer, che already there ). Rather, Blendable it almost to absolute zero, leaving no color whatsoever. Database are not saved: after a couple hours the color bright colors, and dull, departs, leaving in place only the "stars and diamonds", well, just very large and sveikuciai! A couple of hefty blestki, in everyday life, completely wearable. Dark shade behaves (although I did paint a very few, maybe so — but a lot of dark is not me). And this mad carnival, the Shine lasts a really long time. Sad, because gamma was my favorite.
Swatch:
Under natural light from North window:
In the sun:
In the shade:
Photo eyes not consciously spread: very clumsy looks (at least in my version)...
Oh Yes, I forgot: the promised feeling silky it was not caught. Only sequins...
In General, the product was not understood, despite repeatedly attempted to tame. Never figured out what to do with it — except that for a new year party goes... Twenties? I don't know, on the contrary, persistent Association with disco makeup eighties, despite the restraint of hints On, by the way, here is another application — theme party But in this situation the contents of the elegant case is enough for me for 50 years, and even to give into the good hands of no one, some men in the house
In General, if you are not a big fan of sequins and sparkle all over the face, quietly pass by. However, I suspect that skilled hands will be able to tame and this product, but my to those not included, I'm not a master of makeup... I Have here everything is so as described...
Price: about 22 Euro, I do not remember exactly.
Testing period: 3 months, periodically.
All the beauty and happiness :)

#artdeco #kosmetikmarket #limitka #swatch #candlewick #highlighter #shimmer

21
  • I do not know where the highlighter, but is written in a lively, beautiful language that I am in the process of reading several times caught myself thinking "author, write more!!!":)You have an obvious talent rasskazchika and Sverchok, of course, possible under something to adjust, that's party, yeah))
  • Thank you for the kind words Yes, a party option, by far...
  • These shades are awesome!
  • So they hooked. In the same collection there is an analogue in lilac tones, but I suspect the stars from it did not disappear. And as well adorn the sky the face
  •   As an option to tame the glitter liquid base shadow type, or with a brush before applying the eye can shake the...
  • Type not tried yet, thanks for the idea, for the party will be available!And brush shake tried, didn't work. It's just mojo for some, but they still behave the same, though microportion follow with a Damp sponge did not help... No, it's definitely a THING. The wonderful constancy of character. However, it is not something which is expected
  • If not "stars"in the eyes of the shadows, I would have grabbed and ran away, the perfect palmochka for me. But... this is a completely different story.
  • I went ahead and did grabbed Maybe my experience will be useful, although I manage to learn only from your mistakes... Well, almost on their own
  • It is a pity it is a pity that such a capricious thing. Color interesting.
  • The colors are great, but the execution — the Amateur turned out to be...
  • Yes, they have himernye the shadow of the impression and produce more and feel unpleasant. But Matt, I am impressed. Perhaps one day they will try)
  • Try it, I just brushed Artdeco is, soft, manageable to apply and wear and not at all chalky. With such deceit faced for the first time, now I know that in the direction of their shimmery shadows not worth watching Thanks for the warning, and in fact the thirst for experimentation could be to them to have
  • Thank you for the great review!Saw this beauty from one of our bloggers, all so beautifully painted, blah-blah-blah... what they say, and the quality is super and Swatch the eyes are awesome... And at the end of the PostScript that is provided for review, hahaha)) so I have these blogs now walk around the side, where everything is provided for review))) Color, of course, this has to be my favorite, but not surprised, some light himernye shadows Artdeko (odnushki who) behave similarly...
  • That, and I got on the magic word "highlighter", and the colours.The blog is also seen, but now don't believe
  • Read)))) crafty thing I must say... and sequins all mortality as cobblestones)))) box only and liked)
  • Thank you Rocks is right And the packaging is really good. Better content.
  • I have a small ardeko from the glam Shine when zatista on hand was very beautiful, and it fell, and the eyes of all the beauty in the feather disappeared, the cheeks glitter, and the century of vague color, but other series just super shadow, it will be necessary to write about my shades)
  • Be sure to write to be able to go "on a tip", I reviews on Kosmetische really trust ( I'm sure that I'm not alone). And their more sparkly or foot or hand, since it appears that they are...
  • Will make sure, I thanks to Cosmetica ceased to make a bad purchase)
  • You have an interesting read, write posts again!
  • Thanks for the rating , definitely!

Interesting posts

There is no post

Not yet in SQUPER?
Here we discuss cosmetics, fashion, beauty, health and other topics useful for everyone.
arrow